- Admin
- #1
- Joined
- Jul 9, 2006
- Messages
- 6,904
- Reaction score
- 71
Bump and Poll.
OK now I am this [] close to saying that you can disregard my vote, if you pull that system offThe Man In Black said:Also, I hope to move some weapons away from the grind-a-map forever system and get into them to the quest system.
Thothie said:Even then, I can promise you, within a year after youâll be in the same boat again, as people find new exploits, lack of balances, ways to twink, and otherwise ruin the game as best they can, as so many folks make this their primary objective.
Picadilly said:Keep fueling the community with the fumes of suspicion, and you'll continue to have foaming, senseless mobs thirsting for blood, tearing the mod apart at the seams looking to settle personal vendettas at any cost. The simple fact is that NOBODY intentionally tries to kill MS:C. Hell, nobody would need to. MS:C does a good job of killing itself with these unfriendly, and quite honestly, petty attitudes. I wonder how many people have been chased off by this unfriendly, suspicious climate? One of those might have been the guy/girl who would've given MS:C its next epic map series, or sweet looking model. We'll never know now...
Picadilly said:Exploits are usually found accidentally, and in my experience, handed straight to the "Bugs" thread.
Picadilly said:Lack of balances?! Are you kidding me? Lack of balances... Would that be somewhat akin to having a game with dozens of weapons, but only 1 or 2 that can be considered [ds]an effective boss killer?[/ds] Or, would that be more like: "Unnamed(1) has received a Bludgeon Hammer from the Artifact Chest"...?
Picadilly said:Twinking... This is the biggest joke of all. People who are intentionally twinking aren't doing it to "ruin the game". They're doing it because they have an opinion that differs from the "l337" upper ruling class of MS:C that won't be validated in the forums. They're protesting by waging a public relations campaign in the game, directly. But, more than anything, it's a stupid flamewar, nothing more, nothing less. Personally, I've always said: "Make the weapon level requirements absolute."
Picadilly said:End of discussion
Picadilly said:I'll vote for the character wipe when an attitude wipe comes along with it. I'm tired of playing a game that so heavily factionalized, so tiringly vindictive, so exclusive, that you basically end up having to choose the Red Team or the Blue Team or be damned.
Picadilly said:In addition, I feel that MS:C is really starting to show its age on the HL engine. Why not save these changes for MS:S? Then, everyone has to start a new character, you won't even need a vote!![]()
Whatever conflict there is in the community, I ask you to step back a bit and take a good, hard look at everything. It's really not worth destroying what all these people have worked for. Your enjoyment.
The Man In Black said:Whatever conflict there is in the community, I ask you to step back a bit and take a good, hard look at everything. It's really not worth destroying what all these people have worked for. Your enjoyment.
Are you implying that I'm polling a char wipe because I want to PUNISH people? =|
For every exploit Iâve seen reported, thereâs been at least a hundred Iâve patched up that were not⦠However, the same is true with bugs, although the ratio is slightly better in that department. There are those who do go out of their way to attempt to hide exploits from the devs for fear that theyâll be fixed, as demonstrated repeatedly by monitoring chat and watching the radical change in behavior when a dev joins, bind tracking, or watching what people do in servers they think are passworded.Picadilly said:Exploits are usually found accidentally, and in my experience, handed straight to the "Bugs" thread.
Tis true, any weapon described as an âeffective boss killerâ should really just be axed from the game straight off, and my tip-toeing around and slowly nerfing weapons over time, rather than just removing them and coming up with new weapon concepts to avoid mass rebellion is a policy I should have dropped long ago. Also tend to agree that weapon restrictions likely need to be hard-core to cut down on the twinkers (ie. you canât even pick the weapon up.)Picadilly said:Lack of balances?! Are you kidding me? Lack of balances... Would that be somewhat akin to having a game with dozens of weapons, but only 1 or 2 that can be considered [ds]an effective boss killer?[/ds] Or, would that be more like: "Unnamed(1) has received a Bludgeon Hammer from the Artifact Chest"...?
Thothie said:We actually had a much larger community before the last scare, but the mod was also still fresh.